04.06.11
I know what you’re thinking, “another one of those constitutional conservatives.” Bear with me for a moment and let’s travel a few centuries back through our great history. This particular provision (the Fourth Amendment) of our sacred Bill of Rights is a direct result of the experiences and the violations many colonials felt under the governance of England. This broad rule established our freedom from “unreasonable search and seizures” and unlawful entry resulting in the requirement for search warrants, thus securing your right to privacy. Fast forward to the present (pausing for a brief stop in 1974) where “every man’s or woman’s house is his or her castle” and we find the U.S. Privacy Act of 1974, which was enacted to protect the privacy of your personal data that is collected by the government.
This law, although strong and broad in scope, only applies to the government and could be considered the precursor of subsequent laws such as:
These and other numerous regulations address privacy issues that are applicable to the practices of the organizations for which we work and interact on a daily basis.
At this point, two recurring themes or concepts should be apparent; protection of information and privacy. Although the general rule of no expectation of privacy applies to employees within the workplace while using employer resources, it is reasonable to assume the goal of any organization in this modern era of electronic data interchange is to protect sensitive information. The establishment of a good security plan should provide assurance from unwanted access to sensitive data.
If my question is still unclear, then let us consider the definition of computing systems as defined by Pfleeger & Pfleeger (Security in Computing, 4th ed., 2007) . A computing system is a “collection of hardware, software, storage media, data and people that an organization uses to perform computing tasks.” When we use terms such as privacy, protection and computing what often comes to mind is security and, in the context of this article, computer security.
Now that we’re in agreement with regards to the importance of privacy, let me re-phrase my original question:
Simply stated, a good security plan is a carefully written set of security policies and practices that are supported by management, executed throughout all levels of the organization by each employee, periodically monitored and measured for its successes or failures and most importantly, contain a logical methodology for improvement. According to recommendations published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Special Publication 800-30 (Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems ), there are five goals for a good security plan:
Finding the proper balance between the inter-section of the first three of these goals (integrity, availability and confidentiality) is the challenge faced by all information technology security professionals. To accomplish this task, you must determine the types of vulnerabilities and threats that exist within your computing environment.
Threats to your computing system can be described as a set of actions or circumstances that can accidentally or intentionally cause harm through the exploitation of vulnerabilities (flaws and weaknesses) in your system’s security plan. The difference between a threat and vulnerability is explained as follows:
You own a sports car with tire treads that are worn well beyond the manufacturer’s recommendation and have been invited to participate in a legal and sanctioned competition at a local race track. You will have to operate your vehicle at excessive speeds which could cause tire failure resulting in a crash and serious injury. In this example, the worn tires represent vulnerability while driving your vehicle at an excessive rate of speed during the competition represents an obvious threat to your safety.
Not all threats are so easily recognized, particularly within your computing systems environment. Threats to your computing systems can be categorized into four specific classes – interception, interruption, modification and fabrication:
By recognizing the vulnerabilities within your organization’s computer system security strategy, you will be able to better analyze, identify and moderate the types of threats that may exist within your computing environment. This type of analysis, otherwise referred to as risk assessment, is just one component of a comprehensive risk management program that should be deployed throughout your organization.
As part of the development of a successful computer security plan, NIST recommends conducting a preliminary study with personnel to gain an understanding of the operational characteristics of your organization. A suggested sample of some of the information needed and interview questions might include:
For additional information and guidance regarding the creation or review of your organization’s security plan, contact a member of Argy’s Risk Management team:
© 2012 Argy, Wiltse & Robinson, P.C., All Rights Reserved